“ This is grasping at straws on the left, desperate to overturn Justice Thomas,” said Roger Severino and Joseph S.
“This is politics and everything is clear Simple .
Severino’s comments to Fox News Digital were in response. ProPublica report On Thursday, Republican mega-donor Thomas Harlan accused Crowe of taking good vacations.
“ It’s not there because judges always get hospitality gifts from their friends,” Severino said. “And many judges have traveled more on other people’s money than Judge Thomas.
Judges are allowed to receive dinner parties or visit friends without pay and official visits during recess, Severino said.
Judge Thomas defends the ‘cautionary friends’ gift drive
“ There is nothing to see here because there is no allegation that the permission to enter the friend’s property affected Judge Thomas’ decision in any way, Severino said. One thing I know about Justice Thomas is that he never gives in to external pressure. It is governed by the law and the constitution. time. “
Severino accused liberals of “spreading” left-wing bias; The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg performed same-sex marriage before the Oberfell decision; This legalizes federal same-sex marriage.
“Perhaps it shows bias. When should exemptions be sought?” Severino asked. “The media is very good about it, and things like this are brought to the fore by arbitration.”
Judges should not disclose invitations or visits that are considered “personal entertainment” and are not subject to the Supreme Court’s rules of conduct.
The judicial conference, the court’s top body, ruled last month that jurors must be informed about the private jet travel, which Severino Thomas has confirmed he abides by the rules. The Washington Post reported .
AOC said that without someone else, Clarence Thomas would not have been able to write the article
“Judge Thomas was not required to report the visit under the previous law,” Turley said. “Once again, Democrats and the media seem to be aggressive on any story involving Thomas. This leads to absurd calls for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to be impeached.”
Supreme Court rules 12-year-old girls for driving in West Virginia
As for ProPublica’s conclusion that Thomas’ relationship with Crowe somehow influenced the jury’s decision, Severino said:
On social media, many liberal activists called the ProPublica report a “bombshell” and some called for his resignation.
Meanwhile, conservatives on Twitter stood by Severino’s conclusion that there was nothing “complete” in the report.
Author Dinesh D’Souza writes, “Laughter is foolishness.” “He’s talking to a rich friend who pays for dinner. Is this the best? “Clarence Thomas’s real crime is that he’s black and conservative.”
“Read the latest tech coverage of Clarence Thomas going on vacation with a rich friend,” said Greg Price, director of conservative communications.
Supreme Court Lists Louisiana Death Bank for New List
The ProPublica article cited several experts critical of Thomas’ actions, including a retired judge appointed by former President Bill Clinton who called the judge’s actions “unconscionable.”
Other experts echoed Severino’s voice, including New York Law School attorney Stephen Gillers.
“Justice Thomas probably could have accepted, and I believe he (as did others), that the invitation itself was a ‘personal entertainment’ as long as it came from an ‘individual’ and not a corporation or entity. You should do that; be careful,” Giller told The Washington Post.
Thomas released a lengthy statement on Friday.
Thomas acknowledged that the rules had changed last month and that he “intends to follow these guidelines in the future.”
Turley told Fox News Digital that Thomas “did the right thing by making a public statement.”
Click here for FOX NEWS
“Judges have been the guests of private hosts for a long time,” Tarley said. “They are allowed to make friends and receive hospitality. There is no evidence that Crowe has ever been brought to court. But gifts or expensive offers should, in my view, be covered by immunity.”
“I have long defended judicial ethics. The point is that judges should not always be forced to treat every friend as a lobbyist or an influence seeker.